Description
This monograph develops and completes S (k, m, *), a closed structural grammar for analyzing systems in terms of correction capacity. Rather than explaining behavior, predicting outcomes, or prescribing action, S (k, m, *) determines whether a system is structurally capable of correcting itself by examining role-based authority, evaluative asymmetry, and closure. The theory operates at a strictly structural and modal level. Its central distinction is binary: systems are either admissible, in that they possess correction capacity, or inadmissible, in that correction is structurally impossible regardless of performance, stability, legitimacy, or empirical success. Correction capacity is shown to require asymmetric evaluative roles endowed with binding authority and closed enforcement. Where such conditions are absent, correction cannot emerge through learning, adaptation, incentives, deliberation, or internal reform.